<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scaffolding has changed in Rails 2.0:  Has it become un-Agile?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile</link>
	<description>My Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dzonekl</title>
		<link>http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile/comment-page-1#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>dzonekl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevengharms.net/?p=1065#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just discovered the exact same as you describe. Rails 2+ is a step backward from a scaffolding perspective at a first glance. On the other hand, if you have the views generate with all fields, you also get a lot of fields you might not want in your UI. bottom-line. A little bit more work......&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I just discovered the exact same as you describe. Rails 2+ is a step backward from a scaffolding perspective at a first glance. On the other hand, if you have the views generate with all fields, you also get a lot of fields you might not want in your UI. bottom-line. A little bit more work&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile/comment-page-1#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevengharms.net/?p=1065#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I pointed out on David&#039;s site that under Rails 1.x you had a great means for sketching with the dynamic scaffold and migrations and when you wanted to &#039;etch in stone&#039; -- you could use the scaffold generator script.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can roll with the punches, I just miss the flexibility.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pointed out on David&#8217;s site that under Rails 1.x you had a great means for sketching with the dynamic scaffold and migrations and when you wanted to &#8216;etch in stone&#8217; &#8212; you could use the scaffold generator script.</p>
<p>I can roll with the punches, I just miss the flexibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lynch</title>
		<link>http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile/comment-page-1#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevengharms.net/?p=1065#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I ran up against the new scaffolding while following the official tutorial, and had to work out for myself why &quot;scaffold :Foo&quot; in a controller was causing so many problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having tracked down the new way of doing things -- which is completely unmentioned in the release post, for some strange reason -- I think I like it better.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Generating your controller files and templates gives you a great jumping off point.  There&#039;s now far less effort involved in moving from a scaffolded site to a &lt;em&gt;slightly&lt;/em&gt; customized site.  This seems to me more &quot;Agile&quot; than the magic &quot;scaffold :Foo&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran up against the new scaffolding while following the official tutorial, and had to work out for myself why &#8220;scaffold :Foo&#8221; in a controller was causing so many problems.</p>
<p>Having tracked down the new way of doing things &#8212; which is completely unmentioned in the release post, for some strange reason &#8212; I think I like it better.</p>
<p>Generating your controller files and templates gives you a great jumping off point.  There&#8217;s now far less effort involved in moving from a scaffolded site to a <em>slightly</em> customized site.  This seems to me more &#8220;Agile&#8221; than the magic &#8220;scaffold :Foo&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lynch</title>
		<link>http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile/comment-page-1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevengharms.net/?p=1065#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rails 2.0 Scaffolding...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;m learning Ruby on Rails starting with 2.0.  This is occasionally problematic, as it was only released a few days ago, and the tutorials are still all for 1.2.
So, to help others, something not mentioned in the release notes, which causes error...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rails 2.0 Scaffolding&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m learning Ruby on Rails starting with 2.0.  This is occasionally problematic, as it was only released a few days ago, and the tutorials are still all for 1.2.<br />
So, to help others, something not mentioned in the release notes, which causes error&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks Tagged Agile</title>
		<link>http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile/comment-page-1#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks Tagged Agile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevengharms.net/?p=1065#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] bookmarks tagged agile Scaffolding has changed in Rails 2.0: Has it becom...&#160;saved by 1 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;sakubatzumatsu bookmarked on 01/02/08 &#124; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] bookmarks tagged agile Scaffolding has changed in Rails 2.0: Has it becom&#8230;&nbsp;saved by 1 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;sakubatzumatsu bookmarked on 01/02/08 | [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaffolding has changed in Rails 2.0: Has it become un-Agile?</title>
		<link>http://stevengharms.com/scaffolding-has-changed-in-rails-20-has-it-become-un-agile/comment-page-1#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaffolding has changed in Rails 2.0: Has it become un-Agile?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevengharms.net/?p=1065#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] RK Web Technology Resouces News and More wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] RK Web Technology Resouces News and More wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
